Personal Injury Perspective Video Channel is strictly for educational purposes and entertainment purposes only. This video channel discusses sensitive topics for analysis and commentary purposes only and does not offer legal advice. Chad C. Hastings, a Florida and Georgia attorney, does not represent any of the parties being discussed and does not guarantee any result or recovery to any party discussed.
A Defamation Case…About Her Private Parts?
Yes — you read that correctly. I break down the international legal firestorm involving French President Emmanuel Macron, First Lady Brigitte Macron, and an American TikToker accused of making defamatory statements about the First Lady’s private parts. This case raises HUGE questions about:
– French defamation law vs. – U.S. free-speech protections
– Can a foreign country sue a U.S. citizen for online speech?
– Is the TikToker collectible — even if Macron wins?
– Where does this fall on the Justice Scale? (My rating: 3/5)
When speech becomes legally actionable — and when it doesn’t
We’ll walk through the allegations, the legal standards, the jurisdiction issues, and the real-world implications for anyone posting controversial content online. This case also ties into other paradoxes in the law — including international injury cases, maritime injustice, and American wrongful-death inconsistencies — all of which show how unpredictable “justice” can be across borders.
During “Operation 21,” military forces mistook a simple fisherman for a narco-terrorist — and blew up his boat. He wasn’t a trafficker. He wasn’t a criminal. He was innocent. And the most disturbing part? There is almost no legal path to justice. Not for his family. Not internationally. Not under U.S. law.
In this episode, I analyze:
• How Operation 21 went Code Red
• How an innocent fisherman was misidentified as a narco target
• Why foreign military actions are nearly impossible to sue over
• How the FTCA, foreign-country exceptions, and sovereign immunity block these claims
• Why non-US citizens get 0 on the Justice Scale in international incidents
• What would change (and what wouldn’t) if the victim were a U.S. citizen
• Historical examples of friendly-fire law and wrongful death failures
• Why “ex gratia” payments are the only hope — and never guaranteed Justice Scale:
• Foreign national victim — 0/10 • U.S. citizen victim — 1–3/10
This story is shocking, heartbreaking, and legally eye-opening. It shows what happens when governments make catastrophic mistakes — and how families are left with absolutely nothing. This is educational legal commentary only and not legal advice.
Everyone got this case wrong. I keep hearing that the judge or magistrate should not have set this murderer free. However, wait until you see the facts…he should never have been on that train.
In this video, I break down the tragic Irnya Zurutska train murder case — and explains why the public is blaming the wrong people.
🔸 Can you sue the judge?
🔸 Can you sue the court system for letting a dangerous offender out?
🔸 Who is actually legally responsible?
Here’s the truth: Judges and courts are legally immune. But that does not mean the victim’s family has no case. In fact, the train company has serious liability based on failures in safety, security, screening, or foreseeable risk prevention.
✔️ Why judges cannot be sued under Florida and federal law
✔️ What “judicial immunity” really means
✔️ How the train company could be held responsible ✔️ The standards for negligent security and wrongful death
✔️ What the victim’s family would need to prove
✔️ Why this case is NOT as simple as social media thinks.
This is a tragedy — but it’s also a legal case with real implications for public safety, corporate responsibility, and how preventable attacks are handled in the civil justice system.
In this episode I break down a shocking question:
👉 If you’re wrongfully detained or harmed in an ICE raid, can you actually sue the U.S. government?
We dig deep into the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act) and sovereign immunity — and uncover why justice looks very different depending on your status:
⚖️ TPS or Asylum Seekers – Justice Scale: 1/10 ⚖️ U.S. Citizens – Justice Scale: 3/10
This episode exposes how damage caps, federal immunity, and legal loopholes make accountability nearly impossible — even when rights are violated. 📺 Watch until the end for a clear legal breakdown of: How the FTCA works in immigration enforcement cases What rights each group really has (TPS, Asylum, U.S. Citizen)
The rare scenarios where suing the U.S. might actually work.
Country singer Brett James died in a tragic Cirrus SR22 plane crash that also took the lives of two others. But when you look past the headlines and into the law, the real story isn’t the crash — it’s how the justice system fails the families left behind. Under North Carolina’s comparative fault laws, suing Cirrus for potential design or warning failures is nearly impossible — even if questions remain about the aircraft’s safety systems. And for Brett James’ own family, the heartbreak deepens: circular recovery and family exclusions in most aviation insurance policies mean no payout, no recourse, no justice.
The result?
✅ No product liability claim.
✅ No wrongful death recovery.
✅ And no accountability.This tragedy sits at a 1 out of 10 on the Justice Scale — because strict State comparative fault laws and insurance loopholes combine to erase responsibility. 💭 When the law protects systems instead of people — justice doesn’t just fail; it disappears.
The justice system failed — again. 😡 I break down the Minneapolis church shooting from a personal injury perspective and why victims are often left behind.
💥 Quick Takeaways: Why justice often feels broken The real impact on victims How personal injury insights reveal gaps in accountability
🚨 Turnpike Tragedy: The Harjuing Singh Semi-Truck Crash Explained.
He couldn’t even read English — yet he was behind the wheel of a massive 18-wheeler. Was he behind the wheel legally or illegally? Find out in this video. Moments after an illegal u-turn three innocent lives were gone. See the frightening clip of this awful crash.
In this full breakdown, I explain exactly how this crash happened, what the law says about unqualified drivers, and who can be held civilly and criminally liable under U.S. law. ⚖️
🚨 D4VD – MULTIMILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT INCOMING?! | Personal Injury Lawyer Breaks It Down:
The Hernandez family may have a real legal case against D4VD — and it could be worth millions. In this video, I break down the personal injury liability, what we know so far, and how the justice scale shifts drastically if it’s confirmed that she was living with him. As a personal injury attorney, I walk through the legal pathways the Hernandez family could pursue, what “duty of care” means in a case like this, and how key facts could influence whether this goes to trial or settles out of court.
The Houston “ding-dong ditch” tragedy, where a 10-year-old child was shot and killed after a homeowner opened fire during a prank.
Criminally, this looks like a clear-cut murder case — but what about civil justice? Can the family actually recover anything in court?
In this episode, I explain:
⚖️ What a wrongful death and survival action mean under Texas law
🏠 Why homeowner’s insurance won’t cover intentional shootings
💰 How Texas homestead protection shields assets — even after a murder conviction
After the tragic incident involving Charlie Kirk at UVU, one major question remains: could his family file a civil lawsuit against the university or the private security firm for failure to protect him? In this video, I break down how negligent security, duty of care, and wrongful death claims work under civil law — and what legal exposure UVU and their security contractors could face.